4.7 Article

Galectin-1 attenuates hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in mice

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105997

关键词

Galectin-1; Ischemia reperfusion; Liver transplantation; IL-10

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91542205, 81400673, 81470893, 81570591, 81970543]
  2. Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project [2016C37025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is a primary cause of organ dysfunction occurring during liver resection surgery and transplantation. Galectin-1, an endogenous lectin expressed on lymphoid organs, plays an important role in governing innate and adaptive immunity. This study was designed to determine the therapeutic role of galectin-1 and underlying mechanism in hepatic IRI. Methods: Male C57BL/6 mice were subjected to 90 min of partial hepatic ischemia followed by reperfusion with or without treatment with recombinant galectin-1 (rGal-1) or neutralizing anti-IL-10 antibody. Mice were sacrificed at 6 and 24 h following reperfusion. Liver damage related enzymes were determined and cytokines/chemokines were measured by qPCR and ELISA. Results: Administration of rGal-1 significantly attenuated hepatic IRI, including a remarkable reduction in serum ALT/AST levels and an improved liver histology score compared to controls. rGal-1 treatment reduced TUNEL positive apoptotic hepatocytes, attenuated proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-1 beta, IL-12, IFN-gamma, IL-17) and chemokines (CXCL-1, CXCL-10) levels, but upregulated IL-10 expression, compared with controls. In addition, rGal-1 increased the production of IL-10 in hepatic macrophages in vivo and in vitro. Blockade of IL-10 using neutralizing anti-IL-10 antibody reversed the protection of galectin-1 in hepatic IRI in mice. Conclusion: These data suggest that galectin-1 may attenuate hepatic IRI via an IL-10-dependent mechanism, which is a promising therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据