4.7 Article

Obeticholic acid prevents carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis through interaction between farnesoid X receptor and Smad3

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105911

关键词

Obeticholic acid; Carbon tetrachloride; Liver fibrosis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [8137349]
  2. Key Projects of Natural Science Research of Anhui Province in China [KJ2017A202]
  3. Translational Research Institute Research Fund Project of Anhui Province [2017zhyx04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver fibrosis results from sustained liver injury and is characterized by inflammation, hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation and liver structure destruction. The Famesoid-X receptor (FXR) antagonizes toxic liver injury and fibrosis, yet the mechanism in liver fibrosis remains unclear. We investigated the effects of FXR agonist obeticholic acid (OCA) on liver fibrosis in mice. Mice were injected with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) for 3 weeks or 6 weeks to induce liver fibrosis. OCA (5 mg/kg) or PBS is administered daily during CCl4-treatment. At sacrifice, biochemical parameters and fibrosis were assessed. Pretreatment with OCA alleviated hepatic injury in 6 weeks group but not in 3 weeks group of CCl4 liver cirrhosis. At same time, pretreatment with OCA exhibit a dramatic protection of liver fibrosis in both 3 weeks group and 6 weeks group. Further experiments found that OCA pretreatment inhibited alpha-SMA expression and the activation of hepatic pSmad3 in 3 weeks group and 6 weeks group of CCl4-induced liver cirrhosis. Moreover, OCA activated FXR nuclear translocation and increased the interaction between liver FXR and pSmad3. This led to the discovery of a novel role for FXR in regulating fibrosis through interaction with pSmad3. Our data suggest that CCl4-induced liver fibrosis is protected by OCA through interaction between farnesoid X receptor and Smad3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据