4.6 Article

Prognostic value of antibodies to Merkel cell polyomavirus T antigens and VP1 protein in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 174, 期 4, 页码 813-822

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14313

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ligue Contre le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is the main aetiological agent of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Serum antibodies against the major MCPyV capsid protein (VP1) are detected in the general population, whereas antibodies against MCPyV oncoproteins (T antigens) have been reported specifically in patients with MCC. Objectives The primary aim was to assess whether detection of serum antibodies against MCPyV proteins at baseline was associated with disease outcome in patients with MCC. The secondary aim was to establish whether evolution of these antibodies during follow-up was associated with the course of the disease. Methods Serum T-antigen and VP1 antibodies were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant proteins in a cohort of 143 patients with MCC, including 84 patients with serum samples available at baseline. Results Low titres of VP1 antibodies at baseline (< 10 000) were significantly and independently associated with increased risk of recurrence [ hazard ratio (HR) 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-6.53, P = 0.026] and death (HR 3.74, 95% CI 1.53-9.18, P = 0.004), whereas T-antigen antibodies were not found to be associated with outcome. VP1 antibodies did not differ between patients in remission and those with recurrence or progression during follow-up. However, T-antigen antibodies were more frequently detected in patients with recurrence or progression at 12 months (P = 0.020) and 24 months (P = 0.016) after diagnosis. Conclusions VP1 antibodies constitute a prognostic marker at baseline, whereas T-antigen antibodies constitute a marker of disease recurrence or progression if detected > 12 months after diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据