4.6 Article

Efficacy and safety of brodalumab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis and psoriatic erythroderma: results from a 52-week, open-label study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 176, 期 3, 页码 741-751

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14702

关键词

-

资金

  1. Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background A T-helper (Th) cell subset Th17 preferentially produces interleukin (IL)-17 and plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. However, the pathological roles of IL-17 cascades in generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and psoriatic erythroderma (PsE) have not been well established. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brodalumab, a human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody against human IL-17-receptor A (IL-17RA), in Japanese patients with GPP and PsE. Methods This was an open-label, multicentre, long-term phase III study in Japanese patients with rare and severe types of psoriasis. Patients received brodalumab 140 mg at day 1 and weeks 1 and 2, and then every 2 weeks until week 52. The primary endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI). Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and changes in laboratory parameters. Results A total of 12 patients with GPP and 18 with PsE were enrolled. Ten patients with GPP and 16 with PsE completed the study. At week 52 (last observation carried forward), CGI remission or improvement was achieved in 11 patients with GPP and 18 with PsE. The most commonly reported AE was nasopharyngitis (33.3%). Five serious AEs occurred during the study. However, none was considered treatment-related. Conclusions Brodalumab significantly improved the symptoms of patients with GPP and PsE throughout the 52 weeks, and demonstrated favourable safety profiles without any new safety signals. Inhibition of IL-17RA-mediated signalling by brodalumab is expected to be a promising new treatment option for patients with GPP and PsE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据