4.6 Article

Impact of oncogenic BRAF mutations and p16 expression on the growth rate of early melanomas and naevi in vivo

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 174, 期 2, 页码 364-370

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14323

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background It is important to know what drives and arrests melanocytic growth in vivo but observations linking oncogenic mutations to growth rates of melanocytic neoplasms in vivo are sparse. Objectives To clarify the relationship between BRAF(V600E) mutations and p16 expression and the growth rate of melanocytic neoplasms in vivo. Methods We measured the growth rate of 54 melanocytic lesions (26 melanomas, 28 naevi) in vivo with digital dermatoscopy and correlated it with BRAFV600E and p16 expression, and with dermatoscopic and histological patterns. Results Melanomas grew faster than naevi (mean 2.7 vs. 0.8 mm(2)/year; P < 0.001) and the growth rate was faster in lesions with more nests (> 25% nests: 2.0 mm(2)/year vs. < 25% nests: 1.0 mm(2)/year; P = 0.036). Melanomas with the BRAFV600E mutation grew significantly faster than melanomas without the mutation (mean 3.36 vs. 1.60 mm(2)/year, P = 0.018). This effect of the BRAFV600E mutation on the growth rate was not observed in melanocytic naevi (mean 1.01 vs. 0.47 mm(2)/year, P = 0.274). Histopathologically, extensive nesting, larger nests and larger cell sizes were more common in melanocytic neoplasms with the BRAFV600E mutation than in those without the mutation. Melanomas expressing p16 had a slower growth rate than melanomas without p16 expression (2.27 vs. 4.34 mm(2)/year, P = 0.047). This effect was not observed in naevi (0.81 vs. 0.68 mm(2)/year, P = 0.836). Conclusions The expression of BRAFV600E and the loss of p16 accelerate the growth rate of early melanomas in vivo but not in melanocytic naevi. In comparison to melanocytic proliferations that lack the mutation, the epidermal melanocytes in lesions that harbour BRAFV600E mutations are larger and more frequently arranged in large nests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据