4.5 Article

Prescribing trends of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications in UK primary care, 1995-2015

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 858-868

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13000

关键词

attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; CPRD; methylphenidate; time trends; UK

资金

  1. Chercheur-Boursier Award from the Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec (FRSQ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimThe aim of the present study was to describe the prescription of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the UK between 1995 and 2015. MethodsUsing the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), we defined a cohort of all patients aged 6-45years, registered with a general practitioner between January 1995 and September 2015. All prescriptions of methylphenidate, dexamphetamine/lisdexamphetamine and atomoxetine were identified and annual prescription rates of ADHD were estimated using Poisson regression. ResultsWithin a cohort of 7432735 patients, we identified 698148 prescriptions of ADHD medications during 41171528 person-years of follow-up. Usage was relatively low until 2000, during which the prescription rate was 42.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.9, 87.2] prescriptions per 10000 persons, increasing to 394.4 (95% CI 296.7, 524.2) in 2015, corresponding to an almost 800% increase (rate ratio 8.87; 95% CI 7.10, 11.09). The increase was seen in all age groups and in both sexes but was steepest in boys aged 10-14years. The prescription rate in males was almost five times that of females. Methylphenidate remained the most prescribed drug during the 20-year study period, representing 88.9% of all prescriptions in the 6-24-year-old group, and 63.5% of all prescriptions in adults (25-45years of age). ConclusionsPrescription rates of ADHD medications have increased dramatically in the past two decades. This may be due, at least in part, to both an increase in the number of patients diagnosed with ADHD over time and a higher percentage of those patients treated with medication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据