4.7 Article

Hydrogen Atom Abstraction by High-Valent Fe(OH) versus Mn(OH) Porphyrinoid Complexes: Mechanistic Insights from Experimental and Computational Studies

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 58, 期 24, 页码 16761-16770

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02923

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [GM101153]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
  3. Islamic Science University of Malaysia (USIM)
  4. JHU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-valent metal-hydroxide species have been implicated as key intermediates in hydroxylation chemistry catalyzed by heme monooxygenases such as the cytochrome P450s. However, in some classes of P450s, a bifurcation from the typical oxygen rebound pathway is observed, wherein the Fe-IV(OH)(porphyrin) species carries out a net hydrogen atom transfer reaction to form alkene metabolites. In this work, we examine the hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactivity of Fe-IV(OH)(ttppc) (1), ttppc = 5,10,15-tris(2,4,6-triphenyl)-phenyl corrole, toward substituted phenol derivatives. The iron hydroxide complex 1 reacts with a series of para-substituted 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol derivatives (4-X-2,6-DTBP; X = OMe, Me, Et, H, Ac), with second-order rate constants k(2) = 3.6(1)-1.21(3) x 10(4) M-1 s(-1) and yielding linear Hammett and Marcus plot correlations. It is concluded that the rate-determining step for O-H cleavage occurs through a concerted HAT mechanism, based on mechanistic analyses that include a KIE = 2.9(1) and DFT calculations. Comparison of the HAT reactivity of 1 to the analogous Mn complex, Mn-IV(OH)(ttppc), where only the central metal ion is different, indicates a faster HAT reaction and a steeper Hammett slope for 1. The O-H bond dissociation energy (BDE) of the M-III(HO-H) complexes were estimated from a kinetic analysis to be 85 and 89 kcal mol(-1) for Mn and Fe, respectively. These estimated BDEs are closely reproduced by DFT calculations and are discussed in the context of how they influence the overall H atom transfer reactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据