4.6 Article

Prediction of moisture content of wood using Modified Random Frog and Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging

期刊

INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103225

关键词

Hyperspectral imaging; Random frog; Moisture content; Wood; Gaussian process regression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61472368]
  2. Key Research and Development Project of Jiangsu Province
  3. Wuxi International Science and Technology Research and Development Co-operative Project [CZE02H1706]
  4. Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund [CX(19)3087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging was adopted to predict the moisture content (MC) of wood. A total of 30 beech blocks were used in the experiments, each block was dried 7 times to generate different cases of moisture contents. The 210 samples were divided into a calibration set (140) and a prediction set (70) using Kennardstone (KS) algorithm. The spectral data of each sample was collected by the hyperspectral imaging system, and pretreated using standard normal variate (SNV). To solve the problem that the random frog algorithm (RF) needs to reset threshold after obtaining the selection probability of all variables at a time, adaptive reweighted sampling (ARS) and exponentially decreasing function (EDF) are applied to improve RF in this paper. The modified RF (MRF) was compared with RF, successive projections algorithm (SPA) and competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS). Based on the full spectrum data (FS) and four characteristic spectral data, different models were built using Gaussian process regression (GPR). The results show that the MRF not only avoids setting thresholds, but also improves the stability and accuracy of the model. The MRF-GPR model achieved the best predictive performance of wood moisture content, with R-p(2), RMSEP of 0.9785, 1.6125%, respectively. So the hyperspectral imaging technique is suitable for predicting the moisture content of wood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据