4.7 Article

A decision-making computational methodology for a class of type-2 fuzzy intervals: An interval-based approach

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 510, 期 -, 页码 256-282

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.020

关键词

Type-1 and type-2 fuzzy intervals; Bellman-Zadeh decision-making principle; Intersection operator; Imprecision-uncertainty; Interval relations and Interval arithmetic; Risk decision-making problem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an interval-based computational formulation of the Bellman-Zadeh decision-making approach when the handled information (goals and constraints) is represented by type-2 fuzzy intervals (FIs). Our method, which maintains the flexibility of interval arithmetic and interval reasoning as major objectives, consists of representing an Fl by its profiles, which are considered gradual numbers. The developed reflection is based on interval relations to determine a generic formulation of the intersection operation between type-2 Fls, where a computational mechanism can be easily derived. This intersection area is considered an uncertain decision domain that is represented by lower type-1 Fl situations and upper type-1 Fl bounds that are considered extreme situations in adverse situations and favorable situations, respectively. In this framework, any Fl between these Fl bounds can be chosen by decision makers as an optimal solution according to a specified decision criterion. In this paper, a risk decision-making criterion is considered; however, other decision criteria can be employed in a similar manner. The proposed vision offers a convenient tool that enables decision makers to manage their judgment in the possible uncertain domain of a decision. The interest of the proposed approach is the extension of inter-interval relations to type-1 and type-2 FIs, where the Bellman-Zadeh decision-making problem using membership functions can be transformed into an interval arithmetic problem using the Fl profiles. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据