4.5 Article

Usage patterns of paracetamol in France

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 82, 期 2, 页码 498-503

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12957

关键词

adults; drug utilization; paracetamol; risk factors

资金

  1. Boots Healthcare
  2. Reckitt-Benciser
  3. Pfizer
  4. Novartis
  5. Sanofi
  6. Bordeaux PharmacoEpi
  7. French Embassy in IIanoi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIMS The aim of the present study was to describe the real -life usage patterns of paracetamol. METHODS The Echantillon Generaliste de Beneficiaires (EGB) database, the permanent 1/97 representative sample from the French national healthcare insurance system, was searched in 2011 to identify usage patterns, concomitant chronic diseases and use of cardiovascular medication in users prescribed single -ingredient (SP) and combination (CP) paracetamol, representing 85% of all sales. RESULTS Of 526 108 subjects aged >15 years in the EGB, 268 725 (51%) had paracetamol dispensed on >1 occasion; of these, 207 707 (77%) were dispensed only SP and 61 018 (23%) received CP with or without SP. SP users were younger (48.3 years vs. 50.5 years), and 57% of SP users vs. 58% of CP users were female. Chronic comorbidities were more common in CP than SP users. SP users had, on average, 3.4 dispensings per year vs. 5.0 for CP users, for 36 defined daily doses (DDD, 3 g) of SP vs. 53 DDD per year for CP; 49% SP users bought 14 DDD or fewer; 15% bought >60 DDD. Use of paracetamol increased with age from about 16 DDD per year in 15-30-year olds to over 90 DDD per year in patients above the age of 75; 53% of patients <60 years bought fewer than 14 DDD per year, whereas 55% of those >60 bought more than 30 DDD per year. More than half the dispensings exceeded the legal per-box limit of 8 g. CONCLUSIONS Over 50% of the French adult population were dispensed paracetamol at least once over the course of a year, generally for shortterm use. Considering recent misgivings on the real efficacy and safety of paracetamol, such widespread use might have important public health consequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据