4.6 Article

Efficient SO2 Removal Using a Microporous Metal-Organic Framework with Molecular Sieving Effect

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 874-882

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06040

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672186, 21878138, 21908090]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20192ACB21015]
  3. Foundation of Shanxi Key Laboratory of Gas Energy and Clean Utilization [2019-01]
  4. Nanchang University
  5. Arizona State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Removal of trace SO2 contaminants from gas mixtures by the molecular sieving effect is highly desired. Herein, a microporous metal-organic framework Cu-2(pzdc)(2)(pyz) [CPL-1, pzdc = 2,3-pyrazinedicarboxylate; pyz = pyrazine] with a dumbbell-shaped 1D channel and specific binding sites is explored for deep desulfurization. The proper size of 4.1 x 6.2 angstrom and strong SO2 trapping sites on CPL-1 render a high adsorption uptake of SO2 (44.8 cm(3) g(-1)) with a record-high selectivity for SO2/N-2 (368) and SO2/CH4 (74.3) separation under ambient conditions. Moreover, the dispersion-corrected density functional theory calculations have identified the dual specific adsorption sites of SO2, such as S delta+center dot center dot center dot O delta- electrostatic interactions and O delta-center dot center dot center dot H delta+ hydrogen bonds. The feasibility of CPL-1 for SO2/N-2, SO2/CH4, CO2/CH4, CO2/N-2, and mimicked flue gas mixture separations was validated by dynamic breakthrough experiments. Water vapor and CO2 impurity were introduced to the gas feed streams to confirm the excellent separation performance of CPL-1. Moreover, a scale-up production of CPL-1 via a facile and green method was conducted, and a reproducible CPL-1 adsorbent with undamaged adsorption and separation performances was successfully manufactured in kilogram quantity. These unique features render CPL-1 a very promising adsorbent for practical desulfurization processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据