4.6 Article

Engineering New Defects in MIL-100(Fe) via a Mixed-Ligand Approach To Effect Enhanced Volatile Organic Compound Adsorption Capacity

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 774-782

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05751

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576094]
  2. SRFDP [20130172110012]
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2017A030313052, 2019A1515011121]
  4. Guangzhou Technology Project [201804010219]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the development of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), expansion of pore size and exploration of facile preparation conditions are considered as two major goals that are rarely realized together. This study develops a facile method for the room-temperature synthesis of hierarchically porous MIL-100(Fe) under HF-free conditions using a mixed-ligand strategy by simultaneously introducing p-benzoquinone and terephthalic acid (TPA). The resulting MIL-100(Fe) products exhibited abundant micropores, large mesopores (similar to 40 nm) and macropores, and high stability, as revealed by N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, pore size distributions, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The synthesis mechanism of hierarchically porous MIL-100(Fe) elucidated that the introduced p-benzoquinone accelerated crystallization, while TPA generated crystal defects. The as-synthesized hierarchically porous MIL-100(Fe) acted as adsorbents with significantly improved performance than conventional MOFs and zeolites used for toluene and p-xylene adsorption. Furthermore, the adsorption behavior of toluene and p-xylene molecules in MIL-100(Fe) was investigated using molecular simulations. This simple and facile mixed-ligand method shows promise for the large-scale and low-cost production of various hierarchically porous MOFs in a wide range of applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据