4.7 Article

Overexpression of glypican-1 implicates poor prognosis and their chemoresistance in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 115, 期 1, 页码 66-75

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.183

关键词

CDDP; oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; glypican-1; chemoresistance; prognostic predictive biomarker; cis-Diammineplatinum (II) dichloride; isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation

类别

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED [15ak0101024h0002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite the recent improvements in multimodal therapies for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the prognosis remains poor. The identification of suitable biomarkers for predicting the prognosis and chemo-sensitivity is required to develop targeted treatments and improve treatment results. Methods: Proteins highly expressed in ESCC cell lines compared with normal oesophageal cell lines were screened by isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). We identified glypican-1 (GPC1) as a novel molecule. The clinicopathological characteristics of GPC1 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using ESCC specimens, and clinical parameters were assessed. The correlation between GPC1 expression levels and chemo-sensitivity were analysed in vitro. Results: In the immunohistochemical assessment of 175 ESCC patients, 98.8% expressed GPC1. These patients demonstrated significantly poorer prognosis compared with patients with low-GPC1 expression by survival assay (P<0.001). Higher chemoresistance was observed in the GPC1 high-expression group. GPC1 expression levels positively correlated with chemo-sensitivity against cis-Diammineplatinum (II) dichloride (CDDP), and are potentially associated with anti-apoptotic function based on alterations in the MAPK downstream signalling pathway and Bcl-2 family member proteins. Conclusions: GPC1 is an independent prognostic factor in ESCC and is a critical molecule for altering the threshold of chemoresistance to CDDP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据