4.7 Article

Non-Ideal Linear Operation Model for Li-Ion Batteries

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 672-682

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2930450

关键词

Computational modeling; State of charge; Integrated circuit modeling; Lithium-ion batteries; Mathematical model; Li-ion battery; non-ideal energy storage; eco-nomic dispatch; convex optimization

资金

  1. Skoltech NGP Program (Skoltech-MIT joint project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, the characterization of electric energy storage units used for power system operation and planning models relies on two major assumptions: charge and discharge efficiencies, and power limits are constant and independent of the electric energy storage state of charge. This approach can misestimate the available storage flexibility. This work proposes a detailed model for the characterization of steady-state operation of Li-ion batteries in optimization problems. The model characterizes the battery performance, including non-linear charge and discharge power limits and efficiencies, as a function of the state of charge and requested power. We then derive a linear reformulation of the model without introducing binary variables, which achieves high computational efficiency, while providing high approximation accuracy. The proposed model characterizes more accurately the performance and technical operational limits associated with Li-ion batteries than those present in classical ideal models. The developed battery model has been compared with three modelling approaches: the complete non-convex formulation; an ideal model typically used in the power system community; and a mixed integer linear reformulation approach. The models have been tested on a network-constrained economic dispatch for a 24-bus system. Based on the simulations, we observed approximately 12% of energy mismatches between schedules that use an ideal model and those that use the model proposed in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据