4.7 Article

Novel Fault Models for Electronically Coupled Distributed Energy Resources and Their Laboratory Validation

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 1209-1217

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2943123

关键词

Distributed generation; distributed energy; resource; distribution management system; fault calculation; short circuit

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [III-42004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, novel models for electronically coupled distributed energy resources (ECDERs) for online fault calculations of large-scale systems are proposed. ECDERs have different fault responses than traditional synchronous and induction (AC) machines, and generally accepted models for these emerging DERs do not exist. The deployment of ECDERs is constantly increasing worldwide and there is an urgent need for developing appropriate models for fault calculations. In order to have fast calculations, applicable to large-scale systems, the dynamic behavior of traditional AC machines have been approximated in three steady state time-periods (sub-transient, transient, and steady-state). Accordingly, the online fault calculations of large-scale systems have been conducted for these three periods. To simulate the ECDERs' dynamic behavior, and develop models that are compliant with traditional fault calculations, fault models of ECDERs in the sub-transient, transient, and steady-state periods are proposed, with a short peak current period included in the proposed models during the sub-transient period. To validate the proposed models, they are integrated into recently developed online fault calculations, and tested on various large-scale systems. Results from computer simulations are compared with results obtained using state-of-the-art laboratory equipment, as well as with relevant reports on fault current contributions of ECDERs. The results match very well, further validating the proposed models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据