4.7 Article

Pixel-Level Remote Sensing Image Recognition Based on Bidirectional Word Vectors

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2945591

关键词

Feature extraction; Remote sensing; Recurrent neural networks; Image recognition; Semantics; Deep learning; Image color analysis; Attention mechanism; bidirectional independent recurrent neural network (BiIndRNN); bidirectional word vector; graph convolutional networks (GCNs); parallel joint algorithm; sliced recurrent neural network (SRNN)

资金

  1. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Fund Project [2016D01C050]
  2. Xinjiang Autonomous Region Science and Technology Talents Training Project [QN2016YX0051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the traditional remote sensing image recognition, the traditional features (e.g., color features and texture features) cannot fully describe complex images, and the relationships between image pixels cannot be captured well. Using a single model or a traditional sequential joint model, it is easy to lose deep features during feature mining. This article proposes a new feature extraction method that uses the word embedding method from natural language processing to generate bidirectional real dense vectors to reflect the contextual relationships between the pixels. A bidirectional independent recurrent neural network (BiIndRNN) is combined with a convolutional neural network (CNN) to improve the sliced recurrent neural network (SRNN) algorithm model, which is then constructed in parallel with graph convolutional networks (GCNs) under an attention mechanism to fully exploit the deep features of images and to capture the semantic information of the context. This model is collectively named an improved SRNN and attention-treated GCN-based parallel (SAGP) model. Experiments conducted on Populus euphratica forests demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms traditional methods in terms of recognition accuracy. The validation done on public data set also proved it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据