4.6 Article

Flexible Femtojoule Energy-Consumption In-Ga-Zn-O Synaptic Transistors With Extensively Tunable Memory Time

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 105-112

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2019.2951582

关键词

Dielectrics; Logic gates; Atomic layer deposition; Thin film transistors; Neuromorphics; Plasma temperature; Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O (a-IGZO); atomic layer deposition; energy-efficient; flexible electronics; synaptic transistors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61874029, 61474027, 51603151]
  2. National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China [2015ZX02102-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A neuromorphic electronic system requires the component devices to not only mimic typical synaptic behaviors but also be energy-efficient, together with excellent uniformity and tunable memory time. For this purpose, we fabricated amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O (a-IGZO) thin-film transistors with plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition AlOx:H dielectrics, successfully demonstrating typical synaptic behaviors, such as excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic current, pair-pules facilitation, dynamic filter, learning and forgetting abilities and spike-timing dependent plasticity. In particular, such synaptic transistors exhibit ultralow energy consumption down to 3.18 fJ per synaptic event and tunable extensive memory time ranging from 76.6 ms to at least thousands of seconds. The ultralow energy consumption is realized by electron trapping and releasing at and near the interface between a-IGZO channel and AlOx:H dielectric under low voltages. By adjusting the concentration of oxygen vacancy defects in the a-IGZO domain adjacent to the interface by means of changing the growth temperature of the AlOx:H dielectrics, the memory time of the device can be further tuned on a large scale. Device flexibility was also demonstrated by fabricating the synaptic transistors onto polymer substrates at room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据