4.6 Article

Blind Source Separation on Non-Contact Heartbeat Detection by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Algorithms

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 482-494

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2915762

关键词

Heart beat; Doppler radar; Monitoring; Clustering algorithms; Estimation; Blind source separation; Doppler radar; heart rate (HR); non-contact monitoring; blind source separation (BSS); non-negative matrix factorization (NMF); sparseness constraint

资金

  1. Center of Innovation Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency, JST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In non-contact heart rate (HR) monitoring via Doppler radar, the disturbance from respiration and/or body motion is treated as a key problem on the estimation of HR. This paper proposes a blind source separation (BSS) approach to mitigate the noise effect in the received radar signal, and incorporates the sparse spectrum reconstruction to achieve a high-resolution of heartbeat spectrum. The proposed BSS decomposes the spectrogram of mixture signal into original sources, including heartbeat, using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithms, through learning the complete basis spectra (BS) by a hierarchical clustering. In particular, to exploit the temporal sparsity of heartbeat component, two variants of NMF algorithms with sparseness constraints are applied as well, namely sparse NMF and weighted sparse NMF. Compared with usual BSS, our proposed BSS has three advantages: 1) clustering-induced unsupervised manner; 2) compact demixing architecture; and 3) merely requiring single-channel input data. In addition, the HR estimation method using our proposal delivers more satisfactory precision and robustness over other existing methods, which is demonstrated through the measurements of distinguishing people& x0027;s activities, gaining both smallest absolute errors of HR estimation for sitting still and typewriting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据