4.7 Article

Reducing RCS of Patch Antennas via Dispersion Engineering of Metamaterial Absorbers

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 1419-1425

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2925275

关键词

Dispersion engineering; low radar cross section (RCS); metamaterial absorber (MA); patch antenna

资金

  1. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of China [61631015]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [61771485, 61331005, 61501503, 61471388]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [SQ2017YFA0700201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a low radar cross section (RCS) patch antenna is proposed, which is realized by engineering dispersion property of metamaterial absorbers (MAs). The dispersion curve of the MA consists of a weak linear regime with low insertion loss and an asymptotic nonlinear regime with strong absorption. By changing geometric parameters, the dispersion property of the MA can be engineered, so that the cutoff frequency is shifted freely, as well as the strong absorption band being changed. Thus, if the cutoff frequency of the MA is very close to the upper bound frequency of a patch antenna, the patch antenna will obtain polarization-independent low-RCS property out-of-band or in-band cross-polarized and out-of-band copolarized low-RCS properties by replacing the radiation patch with the modulated MA. For verification, a C-band patch antenna with RCS reduction performance in X-band is designed, fabricated, and measured. Both the simulated and measured results agree well and verify that the antenna achieves average gain about 5 dB in 7.2-7.7 GHz. To assess the RCS reduction performance of the proposed patch antenna, we fabricated a 5 x 5 antenna array. The measured results indicate that monostatic RCS of the array is decreased by more than 10 dB in the entire X-band for copolarized and cross-polarized wave normal incidence than the metallic plate with the same area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据