4.7 Article

Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensing Performance and Adsorption Law of Self-Assembly Glucose-Sensitive Membrane

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 610-616

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2944846

关键词

Surface plasmon resonance sensors; glucose-sensitive membranes; glucose oxidase; adsorption isotherm; layer-by-layer self-assembly

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61377091, 61377092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-sensitive surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor was proposed using a self-assembly optical glucose-sensitive membrane (OGSM) and an osmoticprotection membrane on a glass/gold sheet. A prism and an OGSM were assembled to form a multilayer structure such as glass/gold/(PDDA/PSS)(2)/(PDDA/ImGODs)(n)/(PVA+PEG), where the ImGODs layer refers to immobilized glucose oxidases (ImGODs) on mixed nanoparticles consisting of SiO2 nanoparticles (SiNPs) and mesocellular foams (SiMCFs) and where polyvinyl alcohol and polyethylene glycol were used to form an osmotic-protection film. Many glucose-sensing experiments were performed to determine the optimal parameters of the OGSM proposed. For the OGSM with a mass ratio of SiMCFs:SiNPs = 7:3, the plasmon resonance angle of the glucose sensor reduced 2.60 degrees and 0.26 degrees/(mg/dL) of average sensitivity within the glucose concentration range from 0 to 10 mg/dL. The relationships among the resonance angle shift of the sensor, refractive index of the OGSM, and adsorption isothermof the OGSM were established. The relationships showed that the Langmuir isotherm model was suitable for describing the adsorption process of the OGSM for glucose molecules in the concentration range of 0-80 mg/dL. For the SPR glucose sensor with three sensitive bilayers (PDDA/ImGODs)(3), the dependence relationships of resonance angle shift and sensor sensitivity on glucose concentration, Delta theta(res) = -2.076C/(1 + 0.707C) andS = 2.076/(1 + 0.707C)(2), were obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据