4.7 Article

Sensitivity Enhancement of Silicon Strip Waveguide Ring Resonator by Incorporating a Thin Metal Film

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 1355-1362

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2944391

关键词

Metal-assisted silicon strip waveguide; ring resonator; refractive index sensor

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [16-29-09528_ofi_m]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the State assignment FSRC Crystallography and Photonics RAS [007-GZ/Ch3363/26]
  3. next-generation worldwide quantum sensor network with optical atomic clocks project carried out within the TEAM IV Programme of the Foundation for Polish Science
  4. European Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we proposed a metal-assisted silicon strip waveguide design for highly sensitive refractive index sensing applications. To prove the superiority of our proposed design, we make a fair comparison with the standard silicon strip waveguide of comparable geometry. In metal-assisted waveguide structure, a thin SiO2 layer is sandwiched between gold and silicon strip waveguide. The transmission spectrum and E-field distribution of these structures are simulated using 3D-Finite Element Method (FEM). In the first part of the paper, we demonstrated the enhancement of the evanescent field in the upper cladding region of a straight strip waveguide which makes it an ideal candidate for evanescentfield gas absorption sensor. In the second part, we designed a metal-assisted silicon strip waveguide ring resonator of radius 1.5 mu m and verified its higher sensitivity, Q-factor and figure of merit compared to standard ring resonator. The maximum sensitivity of 300 nm/RIU is obtained which is similar to 67% higher than the sensitivity of a standard ring resonator design when sandwiched SiO2 layer is equal to 50 nm in our proposed design. We believe that our study will provide new favourable circumstances to design sensors with improved sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据