4.7 Article

Blood Pressure Control and the Association With Diabetes Mellitus Incidence Results From SPRINT Randomized Trial

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 331-338

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12572

关键词

blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; diabetes mellitus; glucose; random allocation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  4. National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [HHSN268200900040C, HHSN268200900046C, HHSN268200900047C, HHSN268200900048C, HHSN2682009 00049C, A-HL-13-002-001]
  6. NCATS: CWRU [UL1TR000439]
  7. NCATS: OSU [UL1RR025755]
  8. NCATS: U Penn [UL1RR024134, UL1TR000003]
  9. NCATS: Boston [UL1RR025771]
  10. NCATS: Stanford [UL1TR000093]
  11. NCATS: Tufts [UL1RR025752, UL1TR000073, UL1TR001064]
  12. NCATS: University of Illinois [UL1TR000050]
  13. NCATS: University of Pittsburgh [UL1TR000005]
  14. NCATS: UT Southwestern [9U54TR000017-06]
  15. NCATS: University of Utah [UL1TR000105-05]
  16. NCATS: Vanderbilt University [UL1 TR000445]
  17. NCATS: George Washington University [UL1TR000075]
  18. NCATS: University of CA, Davis [UL1 TR000002]
  19. NCATS: University of Florida [UL1 TR000064]
  20. NCATS: University of Michigan [UL1TR000433]
  21. NCATS: Tulane University [P30GM103337]
  22. NCATS: Wake Forest University [UL1TR001420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) demonstrated reduced cardiovascular outcomes. We evaluated diabetes mellitus incidence in this randomized trial that compared intensive blood pressure strategy (systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg) versus standard strategy (<140 mm Hg). Participants were >= 50 years of age, with systolic 130 to 180 mm Hg and increased cardiovascular risk. Participants were excluded if they had diabetes mellitus, polycystic kidney disease, proteinuria >1 g/d, heart failure, dementia, or stroke. Postrandomization exclusions included participants missing blood glucose or >= 126 mg/dL (6.99 mmol/L) or on hypoglycemics. The outcome was incident diabetes mellitus: fasting blood glucose >= 126 mg/dL (6.99 mmol/L), diabetes mellitus self-report, or new use of hypoglycemics. The secondary outcome was impaired fasting glucose (100-125 mg/dL [5.55-6.94 mmol/L]) among those with normoglycemia (<100 mg/dL [5.55 mmol/L]). There were 9361 participants randomized and 981 excluded, yielding 4187 and 4193 participants assigned to intensive and standard strategies. There were 299 incident diabetes mellitus events (2.3% per year) for intensive and 251 events (1.9% per year) for standard, rates of 22.6 (20.2-25.3) versus 19.0 (16.8-21.5) events per 1000 person-years of treatment, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.95-1.49]). Impaired fasting glucose rates were 26.4 (24.9-28.0) and 22.5 (21.1-24.1) per 100 person-years for intensive and standard strategies (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.17 [1.06-1.30]). Intensive treatment strategy was not associated with increased diabetes mellitus but was associated with more impaired fasting glucose. The risks and benefits of intensive blood pressure targets should be factored into individualized patient treatment goals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据