4.7 Article

Optimisation of biohydrometallurgical batch reactor process for copper extraction and recovery from non-pulverized waste printed circuit boards

期刊

HYDROMETALLURGY
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105170

关键词

Biohydrometallurgy; Pretreatment; WPCB plates; Reactor; Cementation

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India [IF140456]
  2. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India [F.6-6/2015-17/EMERITUS-2015-17-GEN-7433/(SA-II)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electronic waste is the fastest-growing solid waste all over the world. The printed circuit board (PCB), an essential part of all the electronic waste is a potential source of various metals thus known as Urban-mine. In this paper, a novel approach to enhance the extraction of copper from non-pulverized waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs) was carried out. WPCBs pre-treatment with NaOH for removal of the epoxy coating was optimized before the bioleaching process. The pretreatment resulted in the exposure of the metal present on WPCBs. Copper was extracted by two-step bioleaching process. In the first step ferric sulphate was biogenerated by Leptospirillum ferriphilum dominating iron oxidizing consortium with 1196.0 mg/L/h of average ferrous sulphate oxidation rate. In the second step, the biogenerated ferric iron was used for copper extraction from a single plate as well as from multiple plates in scale-up studies. In the scale-up study, 3 batches of eleven WPCB plates at a time were studied and an average 168 +/- 1.3 g copper was recovered at the end of the process, which corresponds to 99% leaching. The recovered copper was precipitated from the leachate by the cementation process using iron scrap and almost 99% copper was recovered after the process. The developed process shows the potential to be applied at commercial scale for recovery of metals and the management of electronic waste which leads to conservation of resources and environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据