4.4 Review

Business model innovation in the agri-food sector: a literature review

期刊

BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL
卷 118, 期 6, 页码 1462-1476

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2015-0293

关键词

Innovation; Literature review; Business model; Agri-food sector

资金

  1. Swedish Knowledge Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - Because the business model (BM) is a fairly new concept, research is lacking on business model innovation (BMI) in certain industry sectors. One such sector is the agri-food sector. Using a systematic literature review (SLR) of peer-reviewed journal articles published from 1990 to 2014, the purpose of this paper is to examine the where, when, and how of the use of BMs and BMI in the agri-food sector. Design/methodology/approach - A web-based search was conducted to identify peer-reviewed journal articles that contained a combination of BM or BMI with agriculture-related and food-related terms (e.g. agri-food sector). After winnowing out irrelevant and duplicate articles, 505 articles were chosen for analysis. Findings - Using categories, the paper analyses various data about the selected articles. The categories include research settings, units of analysis, methodologies, and theories. Based on this analysis, the paper finds that these agri-food sector articles are primarily qualitative, empirical studies that focus on one or a few companies (i.e. case studies). The paper also finds that theory is not yet well-developed in the research on the agri-food sector. Originality/value - SLRs of various concepts, theories, and models are common in many fields (e.g. information/software technology, healthcare, and organizational management). However, no such review is available for the agri-food sector, in particular in its use of BMs and BMI. This paper addresses that gap with its review of relevant articles published in more than 300 journals in recent years. Based on this review, the paper draws conclusions about BMI in the agri-food sector and offers suggestions for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据