4.7 Article

Bioleaching of gold from waste printed circuit boards by alkali-tolerant Pseudomonas fluorescens

期刊

HYDROMETALLURGY
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105260

关键词

Pseudomonas fluorescens; Bioleaching gold; Waste printed circuit boards

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2013EEM008]
  2. Key Laboratory for Solid Waste Management and Environment Safety, Ministry of Education of China, Tsinghua University [SWMES 2017-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper evaluated the ability of Pseudomonas fluorescens to leach gold from waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs). Gold was recovered as gold-cyanide complex and cyanide was produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens. In this paper, the effect of pH on gold leaching efficiency was studied, the P. fluorescens was domesticated to grow at higher pH (pH 8 and 9), and the concentration of cyanide ions (CN-) available for bioleaching was increased in alkaline pH. The results showed that at 0.67% w/v pulp density of pretreated waste printed circuit boards powder, mutated bacteria attained gold biorecovery of 27% at pH 9, while the unadapted bacteria only 23% of bioleaching efficiency was achieved. Results revealed that bioleaching efficiency of gold from waste printed circuit boards decreased with the increase of pulp density, and 0.33% w/v pulp density had the maxnium influence to bioleaching efficiency of gold, which could reach 42%. In the two-step bioleaching process, the initial amounts of bacteria had a certain impact on the leaching efficiency, and 3.33% v/v of the initial bacterial liquid was a suitable addition. The type of substrate also affected the leaching bioleaching efficiency. The leaching efficiency in the later stage of gold leaching will be greatly improved to 54%, when glycine and methionine were added to the medium for cyanide production. This may be due to positive effect by the methionine, which could regulate the glycine pool of the cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据