4.4 Article

Consumer views on healthier processed meat

期刊

BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL
卷 118, 期 7, 页码 1712-1730

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-11-2015-0447

关键词

Functional food; Health; Attitudes; Focus group; Consumer; Processed meat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate consumer attitudes towards and interest in enriching processed meat with healthy ingredients (functional processed meat). Design/methodology/approach - Seven focus groups across age and gender were conducted. Discussions were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. Findings - Strategies that participants felt as important for improving the healthiness of processed meat mainly included the use of better quality meat and less salt, fat, preservatives and other additives. Functional processed meat was a new concept for participants. Four themes were constructed to reflect participants' attitudes towards functional processed meat: opposing views on processed meat as a carrier of healthy ingredients; belief in the health benefits of functional processed meat; perceived value of functional processed meat for different consumer groups; and trust and perceived risk surrounding the functional food concept. A large proportion of the participants were unconvinced about the concept of functional processed meat; however many of the participants expressed an openness to purchase this food product if taste and price remained uncompromised. Research limitations/implications - The sample size of the current study is small. Complementary quantitative research with a more representative sample should be implemented. Adopting a quantitative approach, the findings from this study should be explored further to investigate their application in a representative sample of the population. Originality/value - This study represents a first exploratory investigation of consumer views on functional processed meat. It can inform further consumer and market research in relation to the development of healthier processed meat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据