4.5 Article

FANCL gene mutations in premature ovarian insufficiency

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 1033-1041

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23997

关键词

DNA repair; FANCL; mutation; premature ovarian insufficiency

资金

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2016YFC1000600, 2017YFC1001100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81873823, 81571505, 81771541]
  3. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Youth [JQ201720]
  4. Young Scholars Program of Shandong University [2016WLJH26]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway is mainly involved in DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) repair in the genome. Several FA genes, including FANCD1/BRCA2, FANCM, and FANCU/XRCC2, have been identified as causative genes for premature ovary insufficiency (POI). Fanconi anemia group L protein (FANCL) cooperates with FANCT/UBE2T to ubiquitinate the FANCI-D2 dimer, which is a crucial event in the process of ICLs repair. Fancl-knockout mice phenocopy human POI, but the role of FANCL mutations in POI pathogenesis has not been confirmed. In the present work, potentially pathogenic mutations in the FANCL gene were screened in 200 Chinese patients with idiopathic POI and in 200 matched controls. Two novel heterozygous frameshift mutations, c.1048_1051delGTCT (p.Gln350Valfs*18) and c.739dupA (p.Met247Asnfs*4), were identified in the FANCL gene in POI patients but not in controls. Wild-type FANCL protein was predominantly localized in the nuclei, while both mutant FANCL proteins were retained in the cytoplasm. In addition, the FANCL variants exhibited impaired ubiquitin-ligase activity and compromised DNA repair ability after mitomycin C treatment. Furthermore, the FANCL variants were deleterious and might be associated with haploinsufficiency. Our results show that FANCL mutations are potentially causative for POI by disrupting DNA damage repair processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据