4.5 Article

Pathogenic PTPN11 variants involving the poly-glutamine Gln255-Gln256-Gln257 stretch highlight the relevance of helix B in SHP2's functional regulation

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1171-1182

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.24007

关键词

ERK phosphorylation studies; in vitro phosphatase assay; molecular dynamics simulations; Noonan syndrome; PTPN11; SHP2

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/N008324/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MR/N008324/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Germline PTPN11 mutations cause Noonan syndrome (NS), the most common disorder among RASopathies. PTPN11 encodes SHP2, a protein tyrosine-phosphatase controlling signaling through the RAS-MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways. Generally, NS-causing PTPN11 mutations are missense changes destabilizing the inactive conformation of the protein or enhancing its binding to signaling partners. Here, we report on two PTPN11 variants resulting in the deletion or duplication of one of three adjacent glutamine residues (Gln(255)-to-Gln(257)). While p.(Gln257dup) caused a typical NS phenotype in carriers of a first family, p.(Gln257del) had incomplete penetrance in a second family. Missense mutations involving Gln(256) had previously been reported in NS. This poly-glutamine stretch is located on helix B of the PTP domain, a region involved in stabilizing SHP2 in its autoinhibited state. Molecular dynamics simulations predicted that changes affecting this motif perturb the SHP2's catalytically inactive conformation and/or substrate recognition. Biochemical data showed that duplication and deletion of Gln(257) variably enhance SHP2's catalytic activity, while missense changes involving Gln(256) affect substrate specificity. Expression of mutants in HEK293T cells documented their activating role on MAPK signaling, uncoupling catalytic activity and modulation of intracellular signaling. These findings further document the relevance of helix B in the regulation of SHP2's function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据