4.8 Article

Adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with a lower risk of later-onset Crohn's disease: results from two large prospective cohort studies

期刊

GUT
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 1637-1644

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319505

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K24 DK098311]
  2. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation Senior Research Award
  3. Swedish Research Council [2017-00644]
  4. Swedish Research Council [2017-00644] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To examine the relationship between Mediterranean diet and risk of later-onset Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Design We conducted a prospective cohort study of 83 147 participants (age range: 45-79 years) enrolled in the Cohort of Swedish Men and Swedish Mammography Cohort. A validated food frequency questionnaire was used to calculate an adherence score to a modified Mediterranean diet (mMED) at baseline in 1997. Incident diagnoses of CD and UC were ascertained from the Swedish Patient Register. We used Cox proportional hazards modelling to calculate HRs and 95%CI. Results Through December of 2017, we confirmed 164 incident cases of CD and 395 incident cases of UC with an average follow-up of 17 years. Higher mMED score was associated with a lower risk of CD (P trend=0.03) but not UC (P trend=0.61). Compared with participants in the lowest category of mMED score (0-2), there was a statistically significant lower risk of CD (HR=0.42, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.80) but not UC (HR=1.08, 95%CI 0.74 to 1.58). These associations were not modified by age, sex, education level, body mass index or smoking (all P interaction >0.30). The prevalence of poor adherence to a Mediterranean diet (mMED score=0-2) was 27% in our cohorts, conferring a population attributable risk of 12% for later-onset CD. Conclusion In two prospective studies, greater adherence to a Mediterranean diet was associated with a significantly lower risk of later-onset CD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据