4.7 Article

Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 46, 期 24, 页码 14912-14920

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019GL085567

关键词

carbonyl sulfide; biomass burning; emission factor; emission ratio; forest fire; trace gases

资金

  1. UC Laboratory Fees Research Program In-Residence Graduate Fellowship [LGF-17-476795]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research and Biological and Environmental Research
  3. NASA ROSES AuraST program
  4. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences [DE-SC0011999]
  5. F.R.S.-FNRS
  6. Federation Wallonie-Bruxelles
  7. GAW-CH program of MeteoSwiss
  8. International Foundation High Altitude Research Stations Jungfraujoch and Gornergrat (HFSJG)
  9. DOE Office of Science User Facility
  10. Office of Science of the U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  11. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  12. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0011999] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbonyl sulfide (OCS) provides a proxy for measuring photosynthesis and is the primary background source of stratospheric aerosols. OCS emissions due to biomass burning are a variable and substantial (over 10%) part of the current OCS budget. OCS emission ratios from open burning fires, coupled with 1997-2016 data from the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED4), yield OCS biomass burning emissions with a global average annual flux of 60 +/- 37 Gg(S) year(-1). A global box model suggests these emissions are more consistent with observations from global atmospheric composition monitoring networks than fluxes derived from previous synthesis papers. Even after considering the uncertainty in emission factor observations for each category of emissions and the interannual variation in total burned dry matter, the total OCS emissions from open burning are insufficient to account for the large imbalance between current estimates of global OCS sources and sinks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据