4.6 Article

Terrestrial structure-from-motion: Spatial error analysis of roughness and morphology

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 350, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106883

关键词

Digital Elevation Model (DEM); Error; Roughness; SfM photogrammetry; Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry is rapidly becoming a key tool for morphological characterisation and change detection of the earth surface. This paper demonstrates the use of Terrestrial Structure-from-Motion (TSfM) photogrammetry to acquire morphology and roughness data at the reachscale in an upland gravel-bed river. We quantify 1) spatially-distributed error in TSfM derived Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and 2) identify differences in roughness populations acquired from TSfM photogrammetry versus TLS. We identify an association between local topographic variation and error in the TSfM DEM. On flatter surfaces (e.g. bar and terrace surfaces), the difference between the TSfM and TLS DEMs are generally less than +/- 0.1 m. However, in areas of high topographic variability (>0.4 m) such as berm or terrace edges, differences between the TSfM and TLS DEMs can be up to +/- 1 m. Our results suggest that grain roughness estimates from the TSfM point cloud generate values twice those derived from the TLS point cloud on coarse berm areas, and up to four-fold those derived from the TLS point cloud over finer gravel bar surfaces. This finding has implications when using SfM data to derive roughness metrics for hydrodynamic modelling. Despite the use of standard filtering procedures, noise pertains in the SfM DEM and the time required for its reduction might partially outweigh the survey efficiency using SfM. Therefore, caution is needed when SfM surveys are employed for the assessment of surface roughness at a reach-scale. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据