期刊
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 283-289出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22281
关键词
bias; Julia language; liability; simulations
资金
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [P50-AA022537, R01-AA026750]
- National Institute of Mental Health [R01-MH114593]
Traditionally, in normal case-control studies of disorder A, the controls are defined as those not developing the disorder. However, in genome wide association (GWA) studies, controls are sometimes (a) unscreened or (b) screened for both disorder A and disorder B, producing super-normal controls. Using simulations, we examine how the observed genetic correlations between two disorders (A and B) are influenced by the use of unscreened, normal, and super-normal controls. Normal controls produce unbiased estimates of the genetic correlation. However, unscreened and super-normal controls both bias upward the genetic correlations. The strength of the bias increases with increasing population prevalences for the two disorders. With super-normal controls, the absolute magnitude of bias is stronger when the true genetic correlation is low. The opposite is seen with the use of unscreened controls. Adding screening of first-degree relatives of controls substantially increases the bias in genetic correlations with super-normal controls but has minimal impact when controls are screened only for the relevant disease.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据