4.3 Article

Genetic control of some plant growth characteristics of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under aluminum stress

期刊

GENES & GENOMICS
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 245-261

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13258-019-00895-7

关键词

Epistatic QTL; Additive QTL; Aluminum toxicity; Bread wheat; Biomass yield

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Biomass yield is an important trait for wheat breeding programs. Enhancing the yield of the aerial components of wheat cultivars will be an integral part of future wheat improvement. Aluminum (Al) toxicity is one of the main factors limiting wheat growth and production in acid soils, which occur on up to 50% of the arable lands of the world especially in tropical and subtropical regions. Objective Our objective was to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) of plant growth characteristics and yield in wheat. Methods A recombinant inbred line (RIL) population consisting of 167 lines, derived from a cross between SeriM82 and Babax were evaluated under two Al treatments (+ Al, 800 mu M of Al; -Al, 0 mu M of Al) in the field based on an alpha lattice design with two replications for two consecutive crop seasons. Results A total of 40 QTLs including nine putative and 31 suggestive QTLs were found for all traits using the composite interval mapping (CIM) method. By mixed model-based composite interval mapping (MCIM) method, 42 additive QTLs and nine pairs of epistatic effects were detected for studied traits, of which 20 additive and six pairs of epistatic QTLs showed significant QTL x environment interactions. Most of the detected QTLs across environments were stable, and the highest number of stable QTLs was related to A genome. Co-localization of QTL was found on linkage groups (LGs) 2B, 4B, 6A-a, and 7A (CIM method) and 2A-d, and 6A-a (MCIM method). Conclusion These results have implications for selection strategies in biomass yield and for increasing the yield of the aerial part of wheat following further evaluations in various genetic backgrounds and environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据