4.7 Article

The recent progress in proteochemometric modelling: focusing on target descriptors, cross-term descriptors and application scope

期刊

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 125-136

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbw004

关键词

proteochemometric modelling; molecule descriptors; target descriptors; cross-term descriptors; computer-aided drug design

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200986, 41530105, 31171272]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [10247201546, 2000219083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an extension of the conventional quantitative structure activity relationship models, proteochemometric (PCM) modelling is a computational method that can predict the bioactivity relations between multiple ligands and multiple targets. Traditional PCM modelling includes three essential elements: descriptors (including target descriptors, ligand descriptors and cross-term descriptors), bioactivity data and appropriate learning functions that link the descriptors to the bioactivity data. Since its appearance, PCM modelling has developed rapidly over the past decade by taking advantage of the progress of different descriptors and machine learning techniques, along with the increasing amounts of available bioactivity data. Specifically, the new emerging target descriptors and cross-term descriptors not only significantly increased the performance of PCM modelling but also expanded its application scope from traditional protein-ligand interaction to more abundant interactions, including protein-peptide, protein-DNA and even protein-protein interactions. In this review, target descriptors and cross-term descriptors, as well as the corresponding application scope, are intensively summarized. Additionally, we look forward to seeing PCM modelling extend into new application scopes, such as Target-Catalyst-Ligand systems, with the further development of descriptors, machine learning techniques and increasing amounts of available bioactivity data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据