4.7 Article

Molecular simulations of competitive adsorption behavior between CH4-C2H6 in K-illite clay at supercritical conditions

期刊

FUEL
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116358

关键词

Competitive adsorption; CH4; C2H6; Molecular simulation; Shale

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methane (CH4) and ethane (C2H6) are dominating compositions in natural gas produced from shale, approximately 80 similar to 90 percent. For efficient development and utilization of shale gas, the competitive adsorption behavior between CH4 and C2H6 is considerable significance to make sure the storage and transportation mechanisms in the pore structure of shale. The adsorption behavior of CH4-C2H6 in K-illite slits is studied with wide range of aperture (1.5 similar to 5.5 nm), pressure (<= 50 MPa) and temperature (320 similar to 380 K) by using Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The adsorption isotherms, isosteric heats, density distribution and absorbed site are used to analyze the pure and binary adsorption behavior considering the effects of temperature, pressure and contents. The results indicate that the pressure has a large influence on the adsorption capacity of C2H6 and CH4. At the low pressure, the adsorption capacity of C2H6 is stronger than that of CH4. With the increasing pressure, CH4 molecule shows the stronger increasing adsorption behavior than C2H6. From the results of adsorption isotherms of pure gas, excess adsorption amounts of pure CH4 and C2H6 are decreased with broader apertures in unit volume of K-illite slits. C2H6 molecule is easier to full in Killite slits and alkanes absorb on the site of Al-O-Si bond bridge in K-illite. The adsorption selectivity of C2H6/CH4 is more than unity. The content of CH4 suppresses the first and second adsorption peak of C2H6. This work can give some understandings about single and binary gas adsorption behavior in K-illite shales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据