4.7 Article

Quantitative investigation the influences of the injection timing under single and double injection strategies on performance, combustion and emissions characteristics of a GDI SI engine fueled with gasoline/ethanol blend

期刊

FUEL
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116363

关键词

Injection strategy; Effective expansion ratio; Residual gas fraction; Combustion phasing; Emissions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776061]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201706130033]
  3. Hunan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental investigation of the single injection strategy and double injection strategy on the combustion phasing, performance and emissions characteristics in the GDI engine fueled with E10 was conducted. The effective expansion ratio (EER), effective expansion efficiency (EEE) and residual gas fraction (RGF) characteristics were further investigated under single injection strategy and double injection strategy. The result indicated that under the single injection strategy, the change trends of the EER and EEE were the same as the gasoline effective brake thermal efficiency (GEBTE). The maximum value of the EER and EEE were 7.86 and 0.513, and the maximum decrease magnitude of EER and EEE was 8.86% and 3.63%, respectively. However, the change trend of RGF was opposite to BTE, and its maximum increase magnitude of RGF was 4.72%. In addition, with the increase of the second end of injection timing, the peak combustion pressure (PCP), maximum heat release rate (HRR) and mean in-cylinder temperature gradually increased. The position of the maximum PCP and maximum HRR closed to the TDC. The CA50 combustion location advanced and the combustion duration shortened, and thereby increasing the EER, EEE and GEBTE. Finally, comparing the single injection strategy with the double injection strategy, the GEBTE decreased by 5.09%, while the NOx and HC emissions sharply decreased by 54.46%, 31.81%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据