4.7 Article

Experimental study of SO2 emissions and desulfurization of oxy-coal combustion in a 30 kWth pressurized fluidized bed combustor

期刊

FUEL
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116795

关键词

SO2 emissions; Desulfurization; Oxy-coal combustion; Pressurized fluidized-bed

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0600802]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51736002]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2017195]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YJBB1810]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pressurized oxy-fuel combustion (POFC) has attracted wide attention due to its potentials of high efficiency and low cost in CO2 capture. Compared with numerical simulation and system analysis, there are few experimental studies about POFC. In order to investigate the SO2 emissions and desulfurization behaviors of limestone under continuous fuel-feeding POFC conditions, a series of oxy-coal combustion experiments were conducted with a 30 kW(th) pressurized fluidized bed combustor. The results showed that the SO2 emission was almost independent of combustion pressure and excess oxygen coefficient, while it was higher in air than in O-2/CO2 atmosphere because less sulfur was retained by the coal ash. Although the higher CO2 partial pressure caused by an increase in combustion pressure from 0.1 MPa to 0.4 MPa had negative effects on the calcination of limestone and inhibited the indirect desulfurization, the higher combustion pressure was beneficial to improve the direct desulfurization efficiency. An increase in combustion temperature from 850 degrees C to 950 degrees C significantly improved the desulfurization efficiency of limestone with both atmospheric and pressurized oxy-coal combustion. SEM images were obtained and used to show the surface morphology of limestone products under different combustion conditions, which was helpful to the understanding of the desulfurization behaviors of limestone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据