4.7 Article

Formulating gasoline surrogate for emulating octane blending properties with ethanol

期刊

FUEL
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116243

关键词

Octane number; Gasoline; Ethanol; Surrogate fuel; Non-linear blending

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP140100846]
  2. Ford Motor Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work develops a surrogate fuel that reproduces the octane blending of a market gasoline with ethanol. It first extends our previous investigation that reported strong, non-linear blending for ethanol/paraffin and ethanol/aromatic mixtures (Foong et al., Fuel 2014 p. 727) to consider mixtures of ethanol/cycloparaffin, ethanol/olefin, and hydrocarbons from different groups. On the molar basis, ethanol blends synergistically with cyclohexane and 1-hexene, whereas toluene blends antagonistically with ethanol and all hydrocarbons studied. Various alternative surrogate formulations are then considered given the observed inadequacy of toluene reference fuels (TRFs, mixtures of iso-octane, n-heptane, and toluene) in emulating the octane blending behaviours of a market gasoline with ethanol. These alternative surrogates are formulated to match the market gasoline's Research Octane Number (RON) and its major hydrocarbon group composition. The best performing surrogate, which contains 38% iso-pentane, 12% n-pentane, 30% 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 10% cyclohexane, and 10% 1-hexene (all by volume), reproduces the RONs of the market gasoline mixed with ethanol over the entire blending range within 0.5 octane number. This surrogate formulation demonstrates that iso-pentane, n-pentane and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are more suitable than TRF compounds for emulating the octane blending of the gasoline/ethanol mixtures used in this study. A RON correlation is then proposed for the developed gasoline surrogate, taking into account the observed, non-linear interactions of ethanol and individual hydrocarbon compounds, which accurately predicts the RON of the surrogate/ethanol mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据