4.7 Article

Experimental study of influence of Liquefied Petroleum Gas addition in Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil fuel on ignition delay, flame lift off length and soot emission under diesel-like conditions

期刊

FUEL
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116377

关键词

Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil; Liquefied Petroleum Gas; Dual fuel; Soot formation

资金

  1. Government of Spain
  2. FEDER under TRANCO project [TRA2017-87694-R]
  3. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia through the Programa de Ayudas de Investigacion y Desarrollo program [PAID-01-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fundamental behaviour on ignition and combustion characteristics of blends of Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil and Liquid Petroleum Gas was investigated in a constant high pressure, high temperature combustion chamber, using a prototype lab-scale injection system adapted from a conventional common-rail system to conduct the injection events, ensuring that fuel was liquid at any point of the injection system and avoiding the formation of fuel vapour bubbles that could alter the injected fuel behaviour. The ignition delay, flame lift-off length and the soot formation were studied by means of high-speed imaging techniques, for different operating conditions. The aim of the work is to characterize the effect of Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil-Liquid Petroleum Gas blend ratios on the previously mentioned parameters. Experimental results show that the behaviour of the fuel blends follow the expected trends of conventional diesel type fuels when varying ambient temperature, density and injection pressure. Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil, being the highest reactivity fraction, controls auto ignition of the blend. However, Liquid Petroleum Gas acts as combustion inhibitor increasing both ignition delay and lift-off length as its ratio in the blend increases. As a consequence, the differences observed in terms of flame radiation suggest that increasing Liquid Petroleum Gas fraction reduces soot formation as it promotes a higher air/mixture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据