4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of transglutaminase on gel properties of surimi and precocious Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) meat

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105261

关键词

Transglutaminase; Gel properties; Precocious crabmeat; Surimi

资金

  1. earmarked fund for Anhui Provincial Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [AHCYJSTX-08]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-48]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the effect of transglutaminase (TG) on the gel properties of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) surimi in combination with different proportions (0-30%) of precocious Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) meat. Our results show that in the presence and absence of TG, the protein breaking force and deformation reduced significantly (P < 0.05) as the proportion of crabmeat increased. However, following incorporation of TG (0.4%), the breaking force, deformation, and unfrozen water (W-u) content were markedly increased (P < 0.05), most notably when crabmeat was absent. Moreover, with increasing proportions of crabmeat the a* (redness/greenness) and b* (yellowness/blueness) of the product increased significantly (P < 0.05), while L* (lightness) and whiteness decreased. Moreover, noticeable differences were observed between groups that contained TG compared to those that did not. Further, the concentrations of myosin heavy chain (MHC) was found to increase in the presence of crabmeat, while the addition of TG served to catalyze the formation of non-disulfide covalent bonds, thereby causing less MHC to be detected. Nevertheless, no significant change in the secondary structure (P > 0.05) of the proteins was noted, yet all gels that contained TG exhibited a more compact and regular protein network compared to those without TG. These results suggest that the addition of crabmeat may negatively impact gel formation by surimi, while the incorporation of TG may serve to improve mixed gel properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据