4.7 Article

Effect of squalene as a glycerol substitute on morphological and barrier properties of golden carp (Probarbus Jullieni) skin gelatin film

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105201

关键词

Fish skin gelatin; Squalene; Glycerol replacer; Barrier properties

资金

  1. Higher Education Research Promotion and the Thailand's Education Hub for Southern Region of ASEAN Countries Project Office of the Higher Education Commission
  2. Prince of Songkla University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gelatin films prepared by using glycerol (GLY) and squalene (SQ) at different ratios (10:0, 7:3, 5:5, 3:7 and 0:10; w/w) as plasticizer were characterized. Incorporation of SQ reduced the moisture content of the gelatin film (p < 0.05). Films plasticized with GLY/SQ at a ratio of 5:5 (w/w) had highest tensile strength (TS), which was 61.7% higher than that using GLY as plasticizer (GLY). Nevertheless, a continuous decrease in elongation at break (EAB) was attained with increasing SQ ratios (p < 0.05). SQ films had a reduction in water vapor permeability (WVP) and oxygen permeability (OP), compared to GLY film (p < 0.05). Additionally, SQ films had slightly lower lightness with less transparency. Based on microstructure, the cross-section of films plasticized with only SQ (without GLY) presented extremely course structure with large particle size, compared to those plasticized with GLY/SQ mixture or GLY alone. Based on FTIR and DSC spectra, SQ decreased gelatin-gelatin interactions associated with a disordered structure. In addition, SQ film demonstrated lower melting transition (T-max), and enthalpy (Delta H), but a slightly increased glass transition temperature (T-g). Thermal degradation behavior of films showed that GLY film possessed a higher number of gelatin-gelatin interaction than that incorporated with SQ. Thus, SQ could replace GLY up to 50% to render stronger films with improved WVP as well as the OP of gelatin films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据