4.7 Article

Effect of plasma-activated water on the structure and in vitro digestibility of waxy and normal maize starches during heat-moisture treatment

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125589

关键词

Plasma-activated water; Heat-moisture treatment; Structure; Digestibility; Waxy maize starch; Normal maize starch

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21502177]
  2. Program for Science and Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [20HASTIT037]
  3. Science and Technology Basic Research Program of Henan Province [182102110248, 182102310903, 192102110104, 192102110213]
  4. Basic Research Plan of Higher Education School Key Scientific Research Project of Henan Province [19zx012]
  5. Higher Education School Young Backbone Teacher Training Program of Henan Province [2018GGJS093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combined effects of plasma-activated water (PAW) and heat-moisture treatments (HMT) on the structure, physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of waxy (WMS) and normal maize starches (NMS) were investigated. X-ray diffraction results revealed that the relative crystallinity of starches treated with PAW-HMT increased without crystalline type transition compared to DW-HMT. Through the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy, the short-range order of starches treated with PAW-HMT was improved. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis shown that PAW-HMT increased gelatinization temperatures for NMS while decreasing gelatinization temperatures for WMS. The solubility of starches treated with PAW-HMT was higher than that of DW-HMT while the swelling power decreased. Importantly, the resistant starch (RS) content of starches treated by PAW-HMT increased compared to the starches treated by DW-HMT or native starch. This study provides a novel green method to modify the structure, lower starch digestibility and improve the RS content of starch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据