4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Lotus seed oligosaccharides at various dosages with prebiotic activity regulate gut microbiota and relieve constipation in mice

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110838

关键词

Lotus seeds; Oligosaccharides; Resistant starch; Gut microbiota; Short-chain fatty acids; Prebiotics

资金

  1. Research Fund for the China-Ireland International Cooperation Centre for Food Material Science and Structure Design [KXGH17001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601473]
  3. FAFU Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [xjg201811]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [108/c41mke02a]
  5. Department of Education of Fujian [JK2015012]
  6. Science and Technology Major Project of Fujian Province [2018NZ0003-1]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2018J01697]
  8. Projects for Scientific and Technological Development of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University [CXZX2018069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of lotus seed oligosaccharides (formulation consisting of LSO2, LSO3-1, LSO3-2 and LSO4; relative ratios are 1.107:0.554:0.183:0.443, m/m/m/m) at dosages of 0.42, 0.83 g/d/kg bw and 2.49 g/d/kg bw on the microbiota composition and the propulsion of intestinal contents in the gut of mice. The results showed that fecal water content increased in treated mice; there was less gut microbiota diversity than in other groups; and there was a large number of fauna in the cecum of the mice. At the same time, the number of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) bacterial producers increased after feeding with oligosaccharides; Lotus seed oligosaccharides (LOS) also enhanced the concentration of SCFAs in the intestine, which also increased the concentration of cytokines in the serum of mice. In conclusion, these findings suggest that LOS or combination with resistant starch has a better effect on relieving constipation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据