4.7 Article

A modified particle swarm optimization using adaptive strategy

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113353

关键词

Particle swarm optimization; Chaos; Stochastic learning; Mainstream learning; Adaptive strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1731128]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2019-MS-174]
  3. Foundation of Liaoning Province Education Administration [2019LNJC12]
  4. Graduate Science and Technology Innovation Program of USTL [LKDYC201921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In expert systems, complex optimization problems are usually nonlinear, nonconvex, multimodal and discontinuous. As an efficient and simple optimization algorithm, particle swarm optimization(PSO) has been widely applied to solve various real optimization problems in expert systems. However, avoiding premature convergence and balancing the global exploration and local exploitation capabilities of the PSO remains an open issue. To overcome these drawbacks and strengthen the ability of PSO in solving complex optimization problems, a modified PSO using adaptive strategy called MPSO is proposed. In MPSO, in order to well balance the global exploration and local exploitation capabilities of the PSO, a chaos-based non-linear inertia weight is proposed. Meanwhile, to avoid the premature convergence, stochastic and mainstream learning strategies are adopted. Finally, an adaptive position updating strategy and terminal replacement mechanism are employed to enhance PSO's ability to solve complex optimization problems in expert systems. 30 complex CEC2017 benchmark functions are utilized to verify the promising performance of MPSO, experimental results and statistical analysis indicate that MPSO has competitive performance compared with 16 state-of-the-art algorithms. The source code of MPSO is provided at https://github.com/lhustl/MPSO. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据