4.6 Article

Felodipine blocks osteoclast differentiation and ameliorates estrogen-dependent bone loss in mice by modulating p38 signaling pathway

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 387, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111800

关键词

Felodipine; Osteoclast differentiation; Osteoporosis; MAPK; RNA-Seq

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972086, 81672196, 51971222]
  2. Shanghai Rising Stars of Medical Talent Youth Development Program (Youth Medical Talents -Specialist Program) [2019-72]
  3. Technology Innovation Action Plan Key Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [19411962800]
  4. Shanghai municipal education commission-Gaofeng clinical medicine grant [20161423]
  5. Clinical Scientific innovation and Cultivation Fund of Renji Hospital Affiliated School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University [PY20184-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is one of the most common types of osteoporosis resulting from estrogen deficiency in elderly women. In addition, hypertension is another common disease in the elderly, and it has become an independent risk factor for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Here, we report for the first time that felodipine, a first-line antihypertensive agent, significantly prevents postmenopausal osteoporosis in addition to its vasodilation properties. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that treatment with felodipine significantly downregulated the genes associated with osteoclast differentiation. RNA-sequencing and western blotting suggested that felodipine could inhibit bone resorption by suppressing MAPK pathway phosphorylation. Moreover, micro-CT scanning and histological analysis in an ovariectomy (OVX)-induced bone-loss mouse model indicated that felodipine might be a potent drug for preventing osteoporotic fractures. Therefore, this study proposes an attractive and promising agent with vasodilation properties to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据