4.5 Article

Utility of dual-energy CT for predicting the vascularity of meningiomas

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108790

关键词

Meningioma; Multidetector computed tomography; Dual-energy CT; Perfusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can provide iodine, electron density (ED), and effective atomic number Z (Z(eff)) maps, facilitating the identification of tissue types. We investigated whether DECT parameters can predict the vascularity of meningiomas. Method: We acquired DECT and perfusion CT (PCT) images in 24 patients with histologically diagnosed meningioma. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed M the tumor in iodine, ED, and Z(eff) maps derived from DECT and in a blood volume (BV) map derived from PCT. To normalize these parameters' values, we divided them by the values of contralateral normal-appearing white matter, i.e., the relative (r)ED, rZ(eff), and rBV. The vascular density of the tumor specimens was immunohistochemically analyzed by calculating the von Willebrand factor-positive vessel wall. We calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients to determine the correlation with PCT/DECT parameters and an immunohistopathological index. Results: Contrast rZ(eff) (r = 0.7020, p = 0.0001) and iodine (r = 0.5814, p = 0.0029) both had positive correlations with rBV derived from PCT. The rED values were negatively correlated with the rBV values (r = -0.4735, p = 0.0194), and the vascular density results confirmed positive correlations with rBV (r = 0.6909, p = 0.0002) and contrast rZ(eff) (r = 0.4982, p = 0.0132) and a negative correlation with rED (r = -0.4265, p = 0.0377). Regarding the radiation exposure, the mean estimated volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) of DECT was 33.1 +/- 1.72 mGy, much lower than that of PCT (103.3 +/- 4.65 mGy). Conclusions: DECT predicted vascular density with lower radiation exposure compared to PCT. DECT could potentially replace PCT for evaluating the vascularity of meningiomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据