4.2 Article

In clinical practice, cerebral MRI in newborns is highly predictive of neurodevelopmental outcome after therapeutic hypothermia

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 127-133

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2019.12.018

关键词

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; Therapeutic hypothermia; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neurodevelopment

资金

  1. Barts Charity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In the trials, a substantial proportion of newborns who underwent therapeutic hypothermia (TH) had an adverse outcome after hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Cooled babies were noted to have fewer cerebral lesions on MRI but when present lesions were predictive of adverse outcome. We investigate the predictive value of cerebral MRI in babies who undergo cooling in the clinical setting outside of the clinical trials in a prospective UK cohort. Results: Of 75 babies recruited from four centres, neurodevelopment was available for 69 (92%) with 29% (20/69) being abnormal. The unfavourable MRI group (n = 22) had significantly lower motor (p < 0.001), language (p < 0.001) and cognition (p < 0.001) scores on Bayley-III assessment, compared to the favourable MRI group (n = 47). On multiple regression there was a significant relationship between basal ganglia and thalami abnormality and motor (p = 0.002), cognition (p = 0.011) and language (p = 0.013) outcomes. Half of the babies who had an MRI predictive of adverse outcome (11/22) had highest grade cerebral palsy. Cerebral MRI had 95% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 91% PPV and 98% NPV in predicting neurodevelopment. Conclusions: In this clinical cohort, fewer children had adverse neurodevelopment after TH compared to the TH trials. However, half the children who had an MRI predictive of adverse ND outcome had the most severe form of cerebral palsy. In this cohort, cerebral MRI was found to be highly predictive of neurodevelopmental outcome. (C) 2019 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据