4.5 Review

[2+2] Photochemical Cycloaddition in Organic Synthesis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 2020, 期 10, 页码 1310-1326

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201901143

关键词

Photocycloaddition; Annulation; Natural products; Stereocontrolled; Cyclobutanes

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India [EEQ/2016/000518]
  2. INSPIRE-DST, Government of India [04/2013/000751]
  3. NIT Rourkela
  4. SERB, Government of India
  5. Indian National Science Academy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The century old [2+2] photocycloaddition reaction appeared as the most synthetically useful reaction amongst all photochemical reactions. It provides not only cyclobutane ring systems, but at the same time it provides access to medium rings through facile ring expansion/fragmentation of the strained cyclobutane ring. The high regio-and stereoselectivity observed during cycloaddition has made it an attractive tool for synthesis of multicyclic structurally complex natural products. The vast majority of [2+2] photocycloaddition reactions involves enone-alkene cycloaddition which is conveniently achieved through direct excitation or sensitization by UV irradiation. Substantial progress has also been made in [2+2] cycloaddition between two unactivated alkenes using transition metal salts especially copper(I) salts. Sometimes Cu(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition is advantageous over enone-alkene photocycloaddition. Search for an alternative source to environmentally harmful high energy UV light has led to the discovery of transition metal salts which can be used to excite alkenes by visible light. This causes alkenes to undergo [2+2] cycloaddition and has been used for synthesis of cyclobutane derivatives. This review aims to give an overview about different aspects of [2+2] photocycloaddition reaction with an emphasis in the stereoselective synthesis of selected complex natural products and related molecules where cycloaddition has been used as the key step.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据