3.8 Review

Brazilian sandy beaches: characteristics, ecosystem services, impacts, knowledge and priorities

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

INST OCEANOGRAFICO, UNIV SAO PAULO
DOI: 10.1590/S1679-875920160933064sp2

关键词

Sandy beaches; Brazil; Macrofauna; Conservation; Coastal ecosystem

资金

  1. Edital MCT/CNPq/MEC/CAPES/FNDCT
  2. FAPs [47/2010]
  3. SISBIOTA BRASIL
  4. FAPESP [2010/52323-0]
  5. CNPq [563367/2010-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sandy beaches constitute a key ecosystem and provide socioeconomic goods and services, thereby playing an important role in the maintenance of human populations and in biodiversity conservation. Despite the ecological and social importance of these ecosytems, Brazilian sandy beaches are significantly impacted by human interference, chemical and organic pollution and tourism, as well as global climate change. These factors drive the need to better understand the environmental change and its consequences for biota. To promote the implementation of integrated studies to detect the effects of regional and global environmental change on beaches and on other benthic habitats of the Brazilian coast, Brazilian marine researchers have established The Coastal Benthic Habitats Monitoring Network (ReBentos). In order to provide input for sample planning by ReBentos, we have conducted an intensive review of the studies conducted on Brazilian beaches and summarized the current knowledge about this environment. In this paper, we present the results of this review and describe the physical, biological and socioeconomics features of Brazilian beaches. We have used these results, our personal experience and worldwide literature to identify research projects that should be prioritized in the assessment of regional and global change on Brazilian sandy beaches. We trust that this paper will provide insights for future studies and represent a significant step towards the conservation of Brazilian beaches and their biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据