4.7 Article

Optimal battery purchasing and charging strategy at electric vehicle battery swap stations

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 279, 期 2, 页码 524-539

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.019

关键词

Strategic planning; Electric vehicles; Battery swapping and charging; Dynamic fluid model; Production and inventory control

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) General Research Fund [16210215]
  2. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1634133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A battery swap station (BSS) is a facility where electric vehicle owners can quickly exchange their depleted battery for a fully-charged one. In order for battery swap to be economically sound, the BSS operator must make a long-term decision on the number of charging bays in the facility, a medium-term decision on the number of batteries in the system, and short-term decisions on when and how many batteries to recharge. In this paper, we introduce a periodic fluid model to describe charging operations at a BSS facing time-varying demand for battery swap and time-varying prices for charging empty batteries, with the objective of finding an optimal battery purchasing and charging policy that best trades off battery investment cost and operating cost including charging cost and cost of customer waiting. We consider a two-stage optimization problem: An optimal amount of battery fluid is identified in the first stage. In the second stage, an optimal charging rule is determined by solving a continuous-time optimal control problem. We characterize the optimal charging policy via Pontryagin's maximum principle and derive an explicit upper bound for the optimal amount of battery fluid which allows us to quantify the joint effect of demand patterns and electricity prices on battery investment decisions. In particular, fewer batteries are needed when the peaks and the troughs of these periodic functions occur at different times. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据